Over 59316
politifake

Slime Politics


Hildebeast & the New York Slimes -


TAGS: hillary clinton new york times slimes corruption influence peddler msm media water carrier lap dogs mouthpieces democrat cherrleaders progressive puppets
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

OTC - June 10, 2015, 12:10 pm
If she had a papergirl, Hillary would have paid her less than the paperboy, like she did with her female staffers
PeteofSanJose - June 10, 2015, 11:34 am
No no no. She didnt donate to the NY Times. That was her subscription rate!! The paper boy/girl needed a livable wage, so Hill took it upon herself to provide it.


NEWT GINGRICH - PROOF OF EVOLUTION




Well Played, Marco! -




million muslim march -


TAGS: muslime
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by posterman

StoneTools - September 12, 2013, 1:12 am
Over 800,000 bikers showed up even though they were denied a permit


Soylent Pink Slime -


TAGS: pink slime
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - May 30, 2013, 10:13 pm
The slightly pinker grade of slime!
Renza - May 30, 2013, 7:34 am
Though they may have upgraded to taco bell's 33~% meat product.
Renza - May 30, 2013, 7:33 am
Aren't their "hamburgers" still made out of that too?
JGalt - May 29, 2013, 11:06 pm
and to think they learned this technology from McNuggets!
Renza - May 29, 2013, 11:58 am
you sir, are correct
StoneTools - May 29, 2013, 9:55 am
You're missing an o in hooves
Renza - May 29, 2013, 7:38 am
mostly hoves, beaks, and miscellaneous chemicals if I'm not mistaken.


SHOOTER GAMES -




PINK SLIME - I'd rather eat dog meat than meat that looks like turds that even a stray wouldn't want to eat.




THE GUN INDUSTRY - We don’t care who we sell to, as long as we make a killing.


TAGS: corporate slime
Rating: 1.8/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

falconfan00 - April 23, 2013, 3:33 pm
Your fact based retort says it all.
PapaFox - April 23, 2013, 3:28 pm
Your determination to remain ignorant is noted.
falconfan00 - April 23, 2013, 3:08 pm
OMG, this is just too good, i can't leave it alone. Washington DC was in yearly competition to be the murder capital of the US every year. Since the gun ban lifted, they've posted the lowest homicide rate in 25 years.
falconfan00 - April 23, 2013, 1:07 pm
History attests haha. Good lord man. I can't get over that. It's scary how uninformed some people are. Want history? Google the Heller case-2008, and go from there.
falconfan00 - April 23, 2013, 12:57 pm
What color is the sky in your world??? Feinstein/Obama originally proposed a complete gun ban list and new limited magazine capacities. That was in January of 2013 dude. That got slammed down thanks in part to the NRA. Do you seriously not know this?
PapaFox - April 23, 2013, 12:53 pm
The aim of the NRA-ILA is to ensure the industry makes as much profit as possible to whoever will buy their guns. Their actions over the years haven't helped law-abiding citizens one bit, but they definitely have made sure that criminals can get guns.
PapaFox - April 23, 2013, 12:52 pm
Your a**umption would be wrong, as history attests. Their political arm, NRA-ILA, was formed in the 1970's. The 2nd Amendment was safe without them for almost 200 years.
falconfan00 - April 23, 2013, 12:38 pm
and yet, without the NRA, it can be safely a**umed that my 2nd amendment rights would now be a shadow of what they are today. Would you dispute this? They get the results I want, which are to successfully defend my 2nd amendment rights.
PapaFox - April 23, 2013, 12:24 pm
The NRA doesn't give a d*** about your gun rights. It's an industry mouthpiece that responds to anything that threatens guns sales.
falconfan00 - April 23, 2013, 9:07 am
Um.. the NRA battles for gun rights, sure. That's not in dispute. What is, is your argument that the NRA responds to shootings unprovoked. That's not what the NRA responds to. The NRA responds to attempts by congress to infringe on the 2nd Amendment.
PapaFox - April 23, 2013, 9:00 am
The ignorance is strong with this one. The NRA has been battling against gun control for decades, well before Feinstein showed up. Face it, you've been played like a 2 dollar banjo, and you don't have the sense to realize it.
falconfan00 - April 23, 2013, 8:38 am
It's simple supply and demand. The threat of supply dropping to zero amplified demand. The fact that you don't get this shows which one of us is being played here. Unless gullibility is ***y where your from, i'd rethink your argument.
falconfan00 - April 23, 2013, 8:36 am
When liberals threatened to outlaw AR15's, the shelves emptied with people looking to get their arms grandfathered in. It's as simple as that. Obama himself preached the prohibition of 'assault rifles.' That's all the motivation perspective buyers need
falconfan00 - April 23, 2013, 8:32 am
Your chronology of the facts is misplaced, we'll a**ume based on ignorance as opposed to the willful intent to deceive. It goes like this: Liberals like Feinstein threaten legislation, THEN the NRA responds.
falconfan00 - April 23, 2013, 8:29 am
Are you suggesting Feinstein didn't say this? Let me link it for you... http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50139648n
Renza - April 22, 2013, 5:35 pm
So now you want to force people to do things your way? what happened to being for freedom and liberty, or does that only apply when the things you like or enjoy are in question?
PapaFox - April 22, 2013, 5:20 pm
Congratulations. You've been played by the gun industry.
falconfan00 - April 22, 2013, 5:01 pm
So when Dianne Feinstein says things like, "the intent is to dry up the availability of these types of firearms' that doesn't have an effect on the sales of said firearms, but when the NRA repeats what she says, it does. Mmmm. Ok.
OTC - April 22, 2013, 3:15 pm
Seeing how your hands can be a weapon that you can a**ault someone with, we should ban (assault weapon) hands?
OTC - April 22, 2013, 3:10 pm
Prevent life by wearing your gubmint issued con dom. (You do know its a one time use, right?)
PapaFox - April 22, 2013, 2:47 pm
Hence this poster.
PapaFox - April 22, 2013, 2:47 pm
Of course. Every time there's a major shooting the NRA goes batsh*t screaming that the gov is gonna take your guns ANY DAY NOW, and the gullible fall for it very time. Mass murders are the best thing that ever happened to the NRA and the gun industry.
Renza - April 22, 2013, 1:18 pm
So, preventing life, is bad, killing something that's been living for a few years is ok though? sounds legit.
falconfan00 - April 22, 2013, 12:21 pm
LOL. Feinstein and Obama have done more for gun sales in the past 5 years than LaPierre could do in a lifetime, and that's a fact. LaPierre has been CEO of the NRA since '91, and i've never seen shelves empty like they have in the last 5 years.
PapaFox - April 22, 2013, 12:13 pm
You misspelled Wayne LaPierre
falconfan00 - April 22, 2013, 11:22 am
Yes. You are correct. I am referring to a fear monger who preaches paranoia and emotion rather than logic. Specifically, Diane Feinstein.
PapaFox - April 22, 2013, 11:20 am
I take it you refer to the paranoia mongers who scream that the government is going to take their guns away?
falconfan00 - April 22, 2013, 11:01 am
THis is so true. It's actually a huge pain in the rear these days to find ammo of ANY kind, thanks to these gun control nuts driving moderate consumers to the gun stores in droves.
falconfan00 - April 22, 2013, 11:00 am
Not scared of the NRA... Scared of the constituency represented by the NRA, and scared of the NRA's ability to mobilize that constituency come election time.
PapaFox - December 24, 2012, 9:30 am
The Brady Act didn't outlaw a**ault weapons. The a**ault Weapons Ban *would* have prevented it, but it expired under Bush's administration, and he was too scared of the NRA to extend it. FFS, try using your brain once in a while. :-D
foxrecon19d - December 24, 2012, 8:33 am
Ahhhhh...so the Brady Gun Control Act stopped Columbine, VA Tech, Aurora, and Sandy Hook! They never happened because of the Brady Gun Act. Good job killing your own arguement, idiot.
foxrecon19d - December 24, 2012, 8:31 am
Interesting how these anti-gun idiots, in their fanatical efforts to take guns away from law abiding citizens are actually the ones who have forced gun sale profits through the roof! Good job, anti-2nd amendment lunatics!
foxrecon19d - December 24, 2012, 8:29 am
Interesting that crankyhead and the rest of the Obama worshipping sycophants define law-abiding citizens as "crazy people"...just as their God Obama told them to think. BTW, crankyhead, tell us again how you support ABORTION. Hypocrite much?
PapaFox - December 23, 2012, 2:47 pm
Say that to people like Ronald Reagan, who supported the Brady Gun Control Act.
crankyhead - December 23, 2012, 2:46 pm
Interesting that Foxrecon and the rest of the pro life crowd, think that it's more imprtant for crazy people to have access to firearms, than it is for toddlers to have access to a future.
50cal - December 23, 2012, 2:24 pm
Agreed, also find it funny that many of the people who are pro gun control don't understand it does nothing in terms of keeping weapons out of criminals reach. Its would be like smack, weed, etc today. Only deviants who are breaking the laws would have it
foxrecon19d - December 23, 2012, 11:52 am
*baby*
foxrecon19d - December 23, 2012, 11:52 am
Interesting that, for political purposes ONLY, PapaFox and the rest of the pro-bay murdering liberal Democrats are now screaming about a child's right to life. Hypocrite much?


New York Times Hypocritical Hack -




Presstitute Hypocrisy -




New York Slimes Rape Hypocrisy -




New York Times Hypocrisy -




New York Slimes -




Liberal Hypocrisy -




Liberal Media Hypocrisy -




Repugnant RINO -




New York Times Rape Hypocrisy -




THE HORROR! Marco Rubio Has Had Traffic Violations -




question for "moderate" muslims -


TAGS: musslime
Rating: 4.47/5

More politifakes by posterman

fauxnews - January 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...but hey, if that's YOUR THING, well then, ACES! =)
fauxnews - January 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Again, you will get no argument from me that Muslim extremists are freaks just like Xtian fundamentalists are freaks. But to suggest that "Islam"itself is to blame OR that Islam is inferior to other religions based upon these examples is a form of bigotry
fauxnews - January 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
There are several instances in the Bible of violence being used as policy for dealing with things just like there are many instances of extremists using the Bible to justify violence against man (i.e. the Inquisition..wars against Godless Communism,etc.)
fauxnews - January 24, 2015, 1:11 pm
Islam is no better or worse than Christianity. All religions are equal, and equally superstitious. The Bible and Christianity are just as violent and irrational in their teachings and stories as Islam, period.
fauxnews - January 24, 2015, 1:10 pm
The religion/faith of Islam has nothing do with mentally ill rejects deciding to take out their illness on others. Just like Christianity is NOT to blame for the actions of Xtian fundamentalists. Nor should we blame Judaism for the "greed"of the world,etc
fauxnews - January 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
....so for every example you list about Muslim extremists upset over this or that I can counter list an example of Xtian extremists flipping out over dumb things as well...or a Xtian nutjob shooting up an Abortion clinic.
fauxnews - January 24, 2015, 1:06 pm
*yawn* And Xtian fundamentalists flip out over the dumbest things too, like their scorn for Martin Scorcese's excellent depiction of Christ in the "Last Temptation of Christ" simply for showing him having *** (oh, god forbid!). Or their hatred for AD&D
Cyberhagen - January 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
Which do you think should outrage them more? A stupid cartoon, or the misappropriation of their "peaceful" religion to do unspeakable things, repeatedly? Obviously, the cartoon is what most muslims find far more offensive, and gets them fired up. Hello?
Cyberhagen - January 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
The point here, and it's an excellent one, is, tens of thousands of muslims get angry and protest in the streets over a cartoon of their prophet; but large groups of people commit atrocities in the name of their religion, and barely a peep?
Cyberhagen - January 24, 2015, 12:49 pm
Those things only contribute. If you don't see that the common bond and driving idealology behind groups like ISIS is Islam, you're deliberately sticking your head in the sand. But blaming "islam" isn't what this meme does, so you're Strawmanning.
Zeitguy - January 20, 2015, 12:45 am
The woes of the world do need a more complex and intellectual conversation but to absolve an absolute culpable arm of contemporary terrorism is unacceptable and absolutely uncivilized
fauxnews - January 19, 2015, 11:39 pm
...blaming the token Muslim for all the woes of the world OR the Xtian teatard OR the so-called evil rich OR the darn liberals OR those gun-toting conservatives gets everyone NOwhere and avoids the real root of the prob:a species that has lost its way..us
fauxnews - January 19, 2015, 11:36 pm
Stop pandering to the voices in YOUR head and recognize your own insanity. The real causes of violence? Poverty, a poor mental health system, technology without wisdom, corrupt idiots in power. There are plenty of good candidates for your rage...
fauxnews - January 19, 2015, 11:34 pm
A movie doesn't make a person kill anymore than a superstitious text like the Bible makes a person shoot up an abortion clinic. The mental illness in one's head does that, period. And that's the real problem, a civilization with poor mental health care.
fauxnews - January 19, 2015, 11:32 pm
Buddhist fundamentalists in S.East Asia oppressed members of its own people. Someone shoots up a school and blames the video game "Doom." That doesn't mean the majority of any subculture faith, clique, scene should be blamed for the actions of a few
fauxnews - January 19, 2015, 11:31 pm
I stopped reading at "extreme." You said it yourself. Extreme (i.e. fundamentalist). And guess what buddy? Every religious movement has one. The Xtian fundamentalist movement that burned women at the stake and murdered millions more arguably got away w/it
Zeitguy - January 19, 2015, 11:09 pm
If extreme Xtians were collectively mounting armies to exterminate Muslims then there would be outrage by western civilization and the rest of the world, but that is not the case. Al queda, Isis, Hamas; please provide equivilants.
Zeitguy - January 19, 2015, 10:25 pm
Extreme Muslim faith is the driving force for the recruitment of impressionable young men into terrorist Islamic "ARMIES" that justify the killing of innocents. Stop pandering to the politically correct and recognize your own bigotry.
fauxnews - January 18, 2015, 11:40 am
But as far as your coded bigotry against Muslims go...plenty of outrage there! So ACES!
fauxnews - January 18, 2015, 11:36 am
Question for moderate Xtians...Millions of women murdered by your fundamentalists, burned at the stake...Xtian terrorists like McVeigh and others ever bit as bad as terrorists from any other religion? Where is YOUR outrage... Oh yeah,nothing to do w/faith


Politifake School of Journalism and Politics -




PREV PAGE